
On 10 October 2013, the taxpayer, a 49‑year‑old entrepreneur from Mumbai, filed his income‑tax return for AY 2013‑14 reporting income of ₹3,72,770 after selling his residential property.
The assessing officer assessed the return at ₹59,21,730, disallowing a ₹55 lakh deduction that would have corresponded to the wife’s 50% share in the new flat.
ITAT Mumbai, while reviewing the appeal, relied on the Bombay High Court’s decision in CIT v. Dr. Laxmichand Narpal Nagda to assert that holding a legal title within one year is not a precondition for Section 54 relief, and held that the mere presence of the wife’s name as a co‑owner does not deprive the taxpayer of the deduction.
Partner Amit Gupta of Saraf & Partners said the judgment underscores the importance of substance over form in investment‑based tax relief, and could prompt taxpayers to add spousal names without fear of losing Section 54 benefits. The ruling may guide future Section 54 disputes involving joint ownership.