The court’s decision came after William E. Perrine's death in 2024, when his estate totaled $2.33 million in brokerage and retirement accounts. Nancy Perrine, the surviving spouse, challenged the initial probate plan that named the couple’s children as sole beneficiaries.
The judge ordered that the $2.33 million be split evenly, citing state law that prioritizes a spouse’s right to a "reasonable share" when a will is absent. This move overturned the earlier decision that favored the children.
The case also involved a $126,000 transfer William made to his children and grandchildren within the last month of his life. The appeals court held that the gift was intended as a marital asset, entitling Nancy to half of it.
Prosecuting Attorney John Whitaker noted that the court relied on the "equitable distribution" doctrine, a cornerstone of Kentucky's probate statutes. He said the ruling would serve as a precedent for similar cases where spouses seek a fair share.
The Perrine family is expected to appeal the ruling to the Kentucky Supreme Court, where a decision could set a broader precedent for marital rights in intestate estates. Meanwhile, the widow plans to use the funds to settle outstanding medical bills and maintain her home.
Local observers say the case highlights the importance of drafting wills, especially for couples with significant assets. The ruling is expected to prompt a wave of estate‑planning consultations across the state.